Categorized | Guest post

Tags : ,

‘Know Thyself’ and Workplace Conflict

Posted on 27 June 2008

‘Know Thyself’ (γνῶθι σεαυτόν) — referring to knowledge gained as the product of introspection — were the words written at the entrance to the Temple of Apollo at Delphi in Ancient Greece. They are just as important today.

Temple of Apollo at Delphi

Temple of Apollo at Delphi
Photo: Wikipedia

‘Knowing thyself’ is an in-depth understanding of ‘who I am’ and ‘how I am’ — the product of the formal and informal experiences of living. To be clear, this understanding is not the result of simply having experiences, but deep, consistent and conscious reflection on those experiences and the lessons learned (including the good, the bad and the ugly).

Self-awareness often occurs through experiencing an inner conflict which tugs on your sleeve and forces you to change your value system, which is then reflected in new ways of thinking, be-ing and do-ing.

Examples include mid-life crises (which, by the way, are affecting folks at earlier and earlier ages today, no longer just at ‘mid-life’), health, relationship, career and financial issues and mental, emotional or psychological stress.

In the workplace environment, organizational awareness is the totality of each employee’s self-awareness. Where employees are more self-aware, workplace conflict can be minimal and constructive. Where the majority of employees are not self-aware, workplace conflict may well be insidious, toxic, all-pervasive and destructive.

Conflict is more often caused by people than processes

The major cause of conflict and loss in organizations is not processes, but dysfunctional interpersonal dynamics. It is rarely the result of technical issues. Most often, conflict is based on some underlying fear and is therefore an interpersonal-dynamics matter. People relate to one another on the basis of a ‘task orientation’ or ‘relationship orientation’ preference. Task orientation centers around functions, roles and business strategies and tactics. Relationship orientation centers around trust, safety, understanding, respect and sensitivity.

Success and effectiveness are dependent on the synergies that are created when people are in alignment with one another. When that happens, their behaviors support of departmental, team and organizational goals. The way your organization, department or team handles interpersonal conflict can lead to aliveness, fun, collegiality and camaraderie; or to toxicity, demoralization, resentment and derailment.

When people are driven by self-defeating personal biases and assumptions — most of which are unspoken — discord rules until folks agree to ‘out the elephants’ in the room and deal consciously with the dysfunctional behaviors behind the conflict. Only when leaders have the strength and courage to understand that so-called ’soft skills’ are really the hard skills of effective relationships at work — and what’s required to bring other people to that level of awareness — will turf and ego issues begin to melt so that people feel freer to act in ways that fosters mutual respect for one another’s dignity.

The process of ‘knowing thyself’

The process of ‘knowing thyself’ begins when you consciously explore “how I am” and “who I am” when it comes to “the way I am” and communicate with others. That includes verbal and non-verbal behaviors; how you express your feelings and emotions — if you do express them openly; the intentions behind your behavior — including hidden agendas; and any disharmony between what you do and what you say. It requires taking a conscious look at how you work and your interactions with others. Why, for example, you may feel a need to lie, cheat, bully, gossip or be disagreeable and suspicious; and whether where you’re coming from is supportive or limiting to the team as a whole.

A self-aware person is one who examines the quality of his/her interpersonal relationships on a consistent basis. A self-aware organization is one that examines the quality of its interpersonal dynamics in the same way. To be an effective leader, you need to support people to engage in reducing the negative effects of workplace conflict. Focusing on the ‘technical’ alone won’t do it — never has, never will.

Questions for self-reflection:

  • How would you rate your relationships with others? How much trust do you you offer? What is the quality of your communication and your overall attitude?
  • How self-aware are you? How aware of your emotions? What about how you came to believe what you believe about the world of work and the people in it? How far do you understand your values and what really drives you and why?
  • Do you believe life is a ‘zero-sum’ game — that if others get what they want, you must lose out? Why do you think this? Has this attitude brought you more pain or happiness?
  • Do your relationships manifest trust, dignity and respect? Are they based more on ‘task orientation’ or ‘relationship orientation’?
  • Are you harboring grudges from the past? Do you really think you can change the past and make it better?
  • Do you live your life based on the ‘oughts’ and ’shoulds’ of others? Do you have counterproductive habits and patterns you are afraid to let go? Why?


Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Zemanta Pixie

This post was written by:

Peter Vajda - who has written 37 posts on Slow Leadership.

Peter Vajda, Ph.D, C.P.C. is a founding partner of SpiritHeart, an Atlanta-based company that supports conscious living through coaching and counseling. With a practice based on the dynamic intersection of mind, body, emotion and spirit, Peter’s 'whole person' coaching approach supports deep and sustainable change and transformation. Peter facilitates and guides leaders and managers, individuals in their personal and work life, partners and couples, groups and teams to move to new levels of self-awareness, enhancing their ability to show up authentically and with a heightened sense of well be-ing, inner harmony and interpersonal effectiveness as they live their lives at work, at home, at play and in relationship. Peter is a professional speaker and published author. For more information: www.spiritheart.net , or pvajda@spiritheart.net , or phone 770.804.9125.

Contact the author

6 Comments For This Post

  1. Karl Staib says:

    I must admit that it’s only been that last couple of years that I’ve really begun to discover myself. Understanding that it’s okay to make mistakes as well as not be the life of the party. I recently went on a business trip where I let my co-workers do most of the talking. They both liked this because it let them talk.

    Leading by letting others take control when they want to has been difficult, but a worthy challenge that’s opened my eyes to interacting with others.

  2. Steve Roesler says:

    Peter, you’ve captured the issues well here.

    From an organizational perspective, you’ve prompted me to frame some of this more clearly than I may have in the past.

    You say, “The major cause of conflict and loss in organizations is not processes, but dysfunctional interpersonal dynamics.”

    How it often works is that a conflict ensues as a result of some system not working correctly. The larger the organization, the more systems there are to run amiss–sometimes simultaneously. So the “system” or “technology” is described as the cause of conflict in the same way that someone seeking counseling offers up a “presenting” problem.

    Closer examination would reveal that an inanimate object is hardly capable of initiating conflict. Instead, it is the ability of the people involved to respond in healthy ways to the situation.

    This leads to the importance of your “how I am” self-understanding. Until we each genuinely understand how we respond to situations and the people involved, we have no basis for diagnosing why things don’t work out well–time after time. It’s our inclination to examine very carefully the behavior of others. That is almost fruitless in isolation, since it’s the give-and-take between people that creates the dynamic leading to effectiveness or dysfunction.

    Looking only at others is like constantly looking out of a window: You can be very clear about what’s going on outside while, at the same time, termites whittle away at the foundation beneath your feet.

    When the house collapses the person says, astonished: I don’t understand. It was such a beautiful day.”

  3. peter vajda says:

    Karl,

    the journey towards self-discovery is a lifelong journey…(and never a destination); we start when we start…some never do. It appears you realized two important discoveries that seem to serve you well. In addition, it may well be that your two colleagues are more grateful than you’ll ever know. Feels like a true win-win to me.

    “Difficuly and worthy challenges” are the stuff of personal and professional growth. Enjoy the journey.

  4. peter vajda says:

    Steve,

    You say, “Closer examination would reveal that an inanimate object is hardly capable of initiating conflict.”

    Shakespeare said: “An event is neither good nor bad; only thinking makes it so” and, alas, it’s the folks who do the thinking…proactively or reactively.

    Blame is an art form in our culture. Deeper self-reflection is not. The former keeps people feeling safe (albeit, a false safety); the latter is much too scary and challenging.

    So, for many, the easy way out…blame “it, her, him, them…”; never “me”.

    Indeed, many have never built a solid foundation and when their life starts to crumble, haven’t a clue, or awareness of effective self-awareness and self-management strategies…so denial and blame aretheir only options.

  5. Kath Lockett says:

    Great article, Peter. In my own research I’ve found quite consistently that the ‘knowing thyself’ approach is a very common quality amongst people who have the ability to get on with things at work and not suffer as much negative stress.

    I’m not necessarily referring to highly paid CEOs either; often just folk who are in relatively average positions, or have downshifted in order to accommodate more involvement with their families and community - they all have that ability to take a step back, have a think about the situation, learn how not to take things personally and work out how to improve the situation.

    Wise words, and something that I find a continual challenge!

  6. peter vajda says:

    Hi, Kath,

    You make a great point…the correlation between self-awareness and reduced stress…when we accept ourselves as who we are, and not take ourselves so seriously, and without efforting to be someone different - from an egoic perspective - we have a greater capacity to be in the flow of life…and not get knocked out of the box so often and so intensely by work and life challenges. As you suggest…simple but not always easy - thus, part of our respective life’s journey toward experiencing inner peace and well-be-ing- at work, at home, at play and in relationship.

Leave a Reply

Custom Search
9rules member
Business Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

 

Coming later this week

  • Facing Challenging Times
  • Use Balance to Help Overcome Your Fears

All articles and podcasts on this site are held in copyright by their respective authors

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected

Categories

Advertsing

Books etc.

Bad Behavior has blocked 1335 access attempts in the last 7 days.