The Crucial Importance of Benign Neglect

Posted on 12 November 2008

Sometimes leaving people alone is key to successful leadership
 

Lego gardenerSally P. was overworked, burned-out, stressed and exhausted—the whole nine yards. That’s why her boss asked me to talk to her to see if I could help. It didn’t take long to discover the truth. Sally routinely stayed at her desk until 9.00 or 10.00 p.m., though she started work before 8.00 in the morning.

“What do you do?” I asked her.

“All day I’m busy with meetings, customers and staff matters,” she told me. “It’s madness. I only get to do the stuff I need to do after everyone else goes home. Even then I need to spend hours checking everything has been done correctly. Sorting out tomorrow’s schedule. That kind of thing.”

What it came down to was this. Sally checked all the work her subordinates did, even down to correcting typos in their reports and re-ordering “faulty” priorities. When I suggested this was a waste of her time, she got angry.

“Not at all,” she said. “It’s essential. You’ve no idea the mistakes I find. It would be dreadful to let things like that slip past.”

“And what do you say to your people?” I asked.

“Well, I tell them, naturally. Sometimes I get cross with them.”

“And…? Have things changed?”

“Not really. I mean, you can’t get good people today, can you?”

When bosses interfere

Sally’s staff didn’t check their own mistakes because they knew she would do it anyway. They didn’t change because she treated them like naughty children, so that’s how they saw themselves. Besides, they knew she didn’t trust them to do better, so why bother?

Organizations are full of pointless activities that are only needed because nobody trusts anybody else. Full of people who can’t delegate; who have to attend pointless meetings, in case something is said or decided behind their backs; who have to double check and edit their subordinates’ work, because they don’t trust them to do it properly; and who have to devote time to regular boot-licking, because they suspect no one trusts them either.

Yet these same employees who aren’t trusted to behave reasonably in working hours are apparently worthy to choose a government, act on school boards and in positions of public trust, bring up children, handle their own finances and fight and die for their country.

If you pay peanuts, the saying goes, you get monkeys. If you treat employees like naughty children or incipient criminals, that’s pretty much what they’ll become—at least during working hours. And you’ll be like Sally: overworked, stressed, burned-out and neurotic—the typical image of today’s version of Organization Man.

A lesson from a master gardener

My father was a wonderful gardener. His garden was the envy of the neighbors, and the food he grew kept our family supplied with fruit and vegetables year-round. The secret of his success with plants was simple. He made sure the soil was in good condition, planted at the right time, kept the weeds in check—then left the plants to grow.

“Neglect ’em a bit,” he used to tell me. “Don’t be fussing around too much. Plants thrive on a bit of neglect.”

Good leaders and managers do the same as my father. They practice benign neglect. The idiots who cause problems are always fussing around their staff, probing and peering and interfering with them doing their jobs. They’re like children who plant a few seeds and want to dig them up the next day to see if they’re growing. You can forgive children; adults should know better.

‘Benign Neglect’

One of the best ways to help your people find success and develop themselves is to do what my father did. Make sure they have the right conditions—the authority, the resources, the training and clear direction; start them off at the right time—when they’re ready for the challenge; and then let them get on with it. It’s their job, not yours. If they’re busy, you don’t need to be. Neglect them a little. Do your own work.

A major part of that work should be keeping down the weeds. Keep others away from interfering with your people’s jobs. Cut down unnecessary demands. Pull up useless meetings and slice off pointless reports. Weeds like that can choke any hope of good results. Be ruthless. Clear a space for your team to thrive and grow.

What’s most often missing from people’s working lives is time and space to do their job and develop as they should—plus the sense that the boss will let them get on with it, unless they call for help. Benign neglect works. It shows you trust them. It shows you believe in their commitment and ability. Plants thrive on a bit of neglect and so do people. Try it.


Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,


Enhanced by Zemanta

This post was written by:

Carmine Coyote - who has written 295 posts on Slow Leadership.

Carmine Coyote is the founder and editor of Slow Leadership, with a career that stretches from early employment as an economist, through periods in government service, academia and several multinational companies, to retiring as CEO of a US consulting company and partner in a large business services firm. Carmine now lives in Arizona, but is British for all that.

Contact the author

7 Comments For This Post

  1. CK says:

    It sounds like she delegated the work but not the responsibility! She needs to do that as well! She needs to tell the employees that THEY are responsible for the quality of their work.

    Personally, I would do a quick glance over and if I found any required corrections I would hand it back to the employee for correction - period! Otherwise it is YOU doing the employee’s work and not the one YOU are taksed to perform!

  2. Carmine Coyote says:

    @CK: You’re right, CK. But control freaks have special trouble letting go of responsibility, because they don’t trust the other guy to do it right—ever. That’s my point: unless you can trust people enough to let them get on with what they’re being paid to do—and show that you believe they’ll do it properly (even if they need your help at first)—why employ them?

    Keep reading, my friend and thanks for the comment.

  3. CK says:

    @Coyote - I agree. It boils down to trust. What message the manager is sending is “I don’t trust you to do a good job” and that wears on the employees. The first step is to let gooooo! Second step is empower the employee to do their jobs. Third is to communicate with the employees what you want and what you expect from them - leaving no doubt od what is expected. But do expect them to have wants and expectations of you, the manager! It IS a two-way street!

    A manager (or leader) is expected to GIVE trust before he/she can expect trust in return. Sorry but that is what leadership is all about. If you can’t give trust then you can’t be a good leader.

  4. sambit says:

    I agree. Trust begets trust. You treat the employees as kids, kids they will be, for it will give them the chance to be careless.

  5. CK says:

    @sambit - Your ‘kids’ statement reminds me of a former supervisor. She openly stated (in an employee training class) that she was nothing but a babysitter at work. Your statement rings true! But several co-workers were offended by her remarks.

    But I have to remember that it was SHE who was demoted, had a $20,000 cut in pay, and a record in her file to never supervise anyone! But unfortunately they didn’t get all of the cancer that she had left and her toxic tactics spread to other departments and is still within ours.

    Also being in such a toxic environment and despite the punishment, the cancer went underground and just as toxic in an underhanded way. The division is now made up of little kingdoms and departments don’t talk to each other!

  6. Sriram says:

    Thanks for this article. I suspect I liked it because it describes my modus operandi pretty closely. But I always wonder, as a relatively recent entrant to the management ranks, whether my neglect is helping or hurting. How do you know when to back off? What signs do you look for as indicators that the employee needs your involvement? Most would probably prefer that I don’t meddle, so I wouldn’t expect them to ask me outright! And as someone who is expected to manage a team as well as contribute technically, how can I collaborate on a project with an employee whom I also manage, without appearing to micro-manage?

  7. Carmine Coyote says:

    @Sriram: I think the answer lies in the word ‘benign’. There’s a huge difference between being hands-off because you don’t care and allowing people freedom precisely because you care deeply about helping them reach their full potential. When you honestly try to do your best for others, I don’t think you’ll go too far wrong in getting the correct balance. Keep reading, my friend.

Leave a Reply

Custom Search
9rules member
Business Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

 

Coming later this week

  • The Difference Between Complicated and Complex
  • Bad Times Lead to Bad Rules

All articles and podcasts on this site are held in copyright by their respective authors

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected

Categories

Advertsing

Books etc.

Bad Behavior has blocked 793 access attempts in the last 7 days.